Premarietal Sex

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by KAMRUL AHSAN on April 7, 2008 at 11:24pm

Yes. But i appreciate it. I also do it.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by human on April 8, 2008 at 4:49pm

of course affects community , sex is the way to bring humans to the world ...is a start of new family new energy , family means the whole world ....means future , so I think sex does not mean fun ...sex is responsibility and love

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by peta on April 11, 2008 at 9:28am

Defintely- God created sex and it is Holy. There can be a lot of hurt and lack of love in a society as a result of people having premarital sex.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Gerard Ventrella on April 24, 2008 at 8:15am

Amen! So nice to hear someone talking sense on this issue.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by lakshmi on May 2, 2008 at 9:22am

Current status in India ( hindusthan times 2/5/08 4th page)

No sex before marriage. That\'s all the education they need
The entire thinking and decision-making process should not be monopolised by a few so-called educated elites drifting towards western culture
J.S. Sethi

I CAN give sex education in one line - no sex before marriage.
And then there's the recommended version - learn to have sex with as many people as many times as you like without fearing consequences like unwed motherhood or dreaded diseases like HIV/AIDS.

Which one would you prefer your children to hear?

If we educate our children not to have sex before marriage, the need for more/wrong/halfbaked information, curiosity experimen , tation, etc will not arise. True, information on sex is available on the Internet and in books and people indulge in it de- spite religious injunctions.

But does one wrong justify an- other? No religion or culture, bar- ring rare ignoble exceptions, allows sex before marriage. Were the advocates of such a practice all uniformed and ignorant?

If you want to teach your child safe sex, why not also teach them safe robbery and safe murder? All are disallowed: the latter by secu lar law, the formal by spiritual law.

It is not difficult to pass any leg islation today, given the largely uninformed MLAs we have in In dia. But the entire thinking and decision-making process should not be monopolised by a few so-called educated elites who have lost their bearings and are hopelessly and blindly drifting towards western culture.

With respect to Khajuraho's eroticism, which is a creation of some per verted autocrat of his time, no one will shed a tear if the carvings were destroyed or erased.

I do not know who gave these outrageous carvings the status of heritage and on what basis.

Kama Sutra? Yes. But it was only for married people and often presented by a father to his son at the time of his marriage.

I CAN give sex education in one line - no sex before marriage. And then there's the recom- mended version - learn to have sex with as many people as many times as you like without fearing consequences like unwed moth- erhood or dreaded diseases like HIV/AIDS. Which one would you prefer your chil- dren to hear? If we educate our children not to have sex before marriage, the need for more/wrong/half- baked information, curiosity experimen- , tation, etc will not arise. True, information on sex is available on the Internet and in books and people indulge in it de- spite religious injunctions. But does one wrong justify an- other? No religion or culture, bar- ring rare ignoble exceptions, al- lows sex before marriage. Were the advocates of such a practice all uniformed and ignorant? If you want to teach your child safe sex, why not also teach them safe robbery and safe murder? All are disallowed: the latter by secu- lar law, the formal by spiritual law. It is not difficult to pass any leg- islation today, given the largely uninformed MLAs we have in In- dia. But the entire thinking and decision-making process should not be monopolised by a few so-called ed- ucated elites who have lost their bear- ings and are hope- lessly and blindly drifting towards western culture. With respect to Khajuraho's eroti- cism, which is a cre- ation of some per- verted autocrat of his time, no one will shed a tear if the carv- ings were destroyed or erased. I do not know who gave these outrageous carvings the status of heritage and on what basis. Kama Sutra? Yes. But it was only for married people and often presented by a father to his son at the time of his marriage.
( i agree wid the same )

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Sriram on June 23, 2008 at 2:25pm

I can say the reply given by laxmi was simply superb. Ya i completely agree with u coz whatever u mentioned there sounds solid. India stands second in AIDS and 96% of AIDS cases are due unsafe and uncontrolled sex. Other countries kept thinking that india is well civilized and well cultured. Many came here to learn those cultures. But after the advent of AIDS in india everyone say indians are only pretenders of culture..
In india everything happens in dark and thats the reason of why it stands second in AIDS. But as said sex is not a curse its only a nice art of love. Its the best way to express pure love and pure love can be shown with pure hearts and soul.Things gotta change rapidly now people r counting the numbers that with how many they slept. how many times they enjoyed. Thats hurting more. Now a days premarital sex is the latest happening in the society and one who did it is the role model to the others. I think every one should kill this sort of attitude. Any how its sensitive point like two sides of a coin and control can be minimal we almost forgot the era of morals and we r in the era of money and enjoyment and matters

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by kerol on May 7, 2008 at 4:52pm

i think premarietal sex doest not effect a society.. it depends on how they control and manage it..

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by erol gültekin on May 8, 2008 at 10:26pm

Rubbish.I am a muslim.İslam is a life style.and not only in islam belief , also in all one god beliefs premarietal sex is forbidden.Who likes that anyones' mother, or sister do premarietal sex.The woman whom with you do sexual relation is someone's mother or sister.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by ranee on June 9, 2008 at 12:04pm

yes in a lot of ways.
it shud b forbidden

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by arshi on June 11, 2008 at 12:16am

sex is a touchy issue!premarital is of course a no-no in India but times are changing fast!And the pitfalls are their for everyone to see in UK/US!Single mothers and parent,abortions,increased divorces,orphan children......the impact on society is doom....i hope sanity prevails!

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Dr Jurgens Peters on June 13, 2008 at 1:42pm

i agree totally.....Sex is Holy.
Sex is an intense unification of two peoples bodies, souls and spirits.
With sex, you cover each other's nakedness!Isn't that exactly what God did on the cross....you know, for our sins? .......................So to sum it up......No sex before marriage.....

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by DOCSANDS on June 13, 2008 at 9:37pm

I think in this free world we should leave this decision to adults to decide on their own. Our religion forbids it, young blood craves it. Everybody cannot be rational when it involves sex, because many of these decisions are not taken in a rational or logical frame of mind. In short all adults should decide for themselves whether to indulge or not.

▶ Reply to This

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page