A Personal& Professional Networking Site for Doctors& Medical Students Worldwide
Contributedby:Dr.G.BhanuPrakash |
|
Additional Info: |
Radiation necrosis often enters into the differential diagnosis of an expanding brain lesion following therapy. The diagnosis is established by the presence of necrosis, thickened blood vessels and an infiltrate of macrophages. Cytologic atypia is unusual in the associated glia, although the endothelial cells may demonstrate atypia. Either smears or immunohistochemistry will reveal the macrophage population. |
Tags: Dr.G.Bhanu, Prakash, gims, mci, plab, screening, test, usmle.mbbs
Permalink Reply by Dr. Padmesh Jain on January 23, 2013 at 3:47pm This is histopath diagnosis & an invasive method to differentiate radiation necrosis frm brain tumour. Once the patient is undergoing therapy this is not an advisable method due to obvious reasons.
MRS (Magnetic Resonance Spectroscpy) helps to solve the very important issue of differentiation of radiation necrosis and gliosis frm residual or recurrent neoplasm.
Patient with radiation necrosis will have reduced peaks of all metabolites whereas recurrent/residual tumour will have characteristic spectrum of tumour with elevated choline.
one can also take help of MR perfusion imaging for the same. A tumour will be hypervascular whereas radiation necrosis will be hypovascular
will post the image for the same in sometime
Permalink Reply by Dr. Padmesh Jain on January 23, 2013 at 4:20pm
Permalink Reply by Dr. Padmesh Jain on January 23, 2013 at 4:23pm
Permalink Reply by Dr. Padmesh Jain on January 23, 2013 at 4:31pm Now, this sagittal MRI of brain shows post radiation tumour in the left frontal lobe. On perfusion image (2nd image), the corresponding area shows LESS of red colour indicating HYPOvascularity suggesting radiation necrosis.
On MR spectroscopy (last image)same area shows lots of noise and no dominant peak.
Permalink Reply by Dindukurthi Sudhakar on January 23, 2013 at 4:38pm Thanxalot for the very clear explanatory images and the notes, Dr.Padmesh Jain.
Permalink Reply by James Lobo on January 24, 2013 at 12:26am wow..Dr. Padmesh Jain.
thanx 4 such nice explanation with images.
i wasnt aware dat imaging hs so advanced dat v cn non-invasively determine so many things.
Permalink Reply by Dr. Padmesh Jain on January 24, 2013 at 2:32pm thanks Dindukurthi Sir and James.
@james..yes there has been tremendous advancement in the imaging modlities and nowadays with help of imaging features we can in some cases with 90 % accuracy predict the histological type as well..isnt that amazing ?
Permalink Reply by James Lobo on January 26, 2013 at 6:07pm yes Sir, this is really amazing and exciting.
© 2013 Doctors Hangout | About DH